logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.08.11 2020고단847
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has operated a mutual test company in the name of “B”.

피고인은 2012년 말경 가구 도ㆍ소매 업체인 ‘C’를 운영하는 피해자 D에게 “내가 과천 E 미술관 인테리어공사를 수주하였는데 발주처인 교회에 잘 얘기해서 당신이 미술관에 가구를 납품할 수 있게 해주겠다.”라는 취지로 말하여 환심을 산 후, 2013. 1. 초순경 과천시 F에 있는 위 E 미술관 인테리어공사 현장에서 피해자에게 “먼저 발주처인 교회 목사님 댁에 가구를 납품해 주면 E 미술관 공사대금을 받아 가구 대금을 지급하겠다.”라는 취지로 거짓말을 하였다.

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant did not have the ability to pay the price for a household in the future when he did not receive the said art gallery in excess of the total amount of 200 million won, such as the unpaid tax, unpaid fine, loan obligations, etc. of the National Tax Service.

Ultimately, even if the Corporation is supplied with a household from the victim, such as the suspension of construction due to the request of the ordering party, there was no intention or ability to pay the price.

The Defendant received from the victim a total of 12,550,000 won from the church pastors house located in the Buddhist area of not more than 15,000 on January 15, 2013.

In addition, the Defendant received from the victim a total of KRW 5,550,000 from September 4, 2013, as indicated in the same method, a household equal to the victim’s total of KRW 55,550,000, as indicated in the list of crimes.

As a result, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's written confirmation of the payment of the suspect's interrogation of some prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the defendant's suspect's suspect's interrogation of the defendant's partial statement D, E art gallery production and previous production households, credit information history, details of fine payment, investigation report (the submission of related case's written opinion and written decision of non-prosecution).

arrow