A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On August 22, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a period of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court, and two years for a suspended sentence of six months for the same crime at the same court on November 10, 201.

Although the Defendant had had a record of driving alcohol twice or more as above, on April 8, 2017, the Defendant driven a BE-ray car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.263% during blood around 18:18, and proceeds from the road located in 565-1, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon, to the road of 177 Do-ro 28, Seo-gu, Incheon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: References to inquiries, investigation reports (Attachment to the same type of judgment attached thereto), judgments attached thereto, and application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes of summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (the act of breaking one's mistake, etc.) of the Act on the Reduction of Quantity was that the defendant was a substitute driver after drinking alcohol, but the defendant was not a substitute driver, so he was not a substitute driver, and thus the substitute driver was not a substitute driver was not a driver, and the defendant had a large way to easily get a substitute driver, and there is no extenuating circumstance for the defendant such as supporting the mother and the wife, but there is a number of criminal records of the same kind caused by drinking or non-driving, and even if there was a record of being sentenced two times or suspended sentence or suspended sentence, the defendant had to drive a motor vehicle in this case under the condition of driving a motor vehicle under the condition of only 0.263% at the same time, and there was a very poor nature of the crime, and there was an inevitable reason for the defendant to have been a criminal punishment.

In the end, the Defendant’s awareness of compliance with the traffic-related laws and regulations is rare.

shall be deemed to be.