logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.18 2016고정3027
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2016, the Defendant driven a d SM5 car at approximately 2 meters while under the influence of alcohol 0.086% in blood alcohol within the gas station B located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a notification of the results of regulating drinking driving and a statement in the circumstances of drinking drivers;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) (excluding punishment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. A fine of 1.5 million won to be suspended from missionary work;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the defendant led to the crime of this case, reflects the fact that the defendant is driving an acting driver, and the circumstances of this case are as follows: the defendant's substitute driver was responsible for driving the vehicle while entering a gas charging lawsuit, and the substitute driver was damaged on the vehicle due to shocking the road. For this reason, the defendant and the substitute driver were at the time when the substitute driver was traveling the vehicle, which would interfere with the operation of the shock station employee, and interfere with the operation of the shock station employee, but the substitute driver refused the vehicle and moved the vehicle as stated in the facts charged. However, there are considerable circumstances to consider the situation where the driving of the vehicle was driven by drinking, the distance of the vehicle driven by the defendant was extremely short distance in gas charging, the defendant's vehicle was extremely short distance in the charge of drinking, and the remaining vehicle traveling except for the part directly driven by him, and thus, the defendant was not subject to criminal punishment at all prior to the order of the vehicle.)

arrow