logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원영동지원 2016.07.06 2014가합945
약정금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 105,250,000 won to the plaintiff and 15% per annum from October 29, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Building permit, etc. as of July 9, 2008 on the instant building 1) The Defendant on November 15, 2006, on the land and buildings listed in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant land”) and the said building, “the instant building”, and “the instant real estate” in the case of a general title to the said land and buildings.

The registration of ownership transfer was completed on October 25, 2006 as to the whole share of the building in this case where there was a neighborhood living facility of 1,470.97 square meters in the facility area at the time of the registration of ownership transfer based on the sale and purchase as of October 25, 2006.

On July 9, 2008, the Defendant obtained permission from the head of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for change of the purpose of use and large-scale repair of the instant building (hereinafter “the first building permission”). The main content is “(i) the change of the use of “medical facilities (a hospital)” from the first floor to the fifth floor above the ground of the instant building, (ii) the large-scale repair of an elevator, and (iii) the installation of an attached parking lot that can park a total of 15 vehicles on the 15 square meters of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C& 412.1 square meters after the removal of existing mechanical parking facilities.”

3) After the first building permit, the Defendant conducted construction works in a convalescent hospital with respect to the instant real estate, and removed mechanical parking facilities in accordance with the details of the first building permit. However, the Defendant gradually aggravated financial standing, and the Defendant suspended the said construction work. (B) On February 27, 2014, the Defendant concluding a “real estate consulting contract” between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, which entered into between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, with respect to the instant real estate, constitutes “real estate consulting contract” (hereinafter “instant consulting contract”).

The main contents of the contract are as follows. B D (Defendant, hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) and contractor A (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff and hereinafter referred to as “B”) of the real estate consulting contract are as follows: The Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E building (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) is overall work in promoting the sale of the instant building.

arrow