1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 2015, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement between the Plaintiff and the Information and Communications Technology Industry Promotion Agency under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, and the Korea Racing Association for the purpose of “ UNICTRN FAOY UNFCCCD Digital Contents Establishment Project” (hereinafter “instant project”).

B. On June 25, 2015, the Korea Racing Association, which is an institution participating in the instant project, applies for permission to construct (large-scale repair), etc. of the Korea Racing Association, and disposition of refusal by the Defendant, is an institution participating in the instant project, and is the place where the instant project is established, and is the place where the horse racing is located outside the M

) the 52-ground buildings in Yongsan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul (hereinafter referred to as the “instant building”).

(2) On July 29, 2015, the Defendant applied for a change in the building permit (large-scale repair), change of purpose of use, and entries in the building ledger to install a “multicultural space” on the first and seventh floors. On the ground that it is inappropriate to install “family-type leisure facilities” to allow juveniles to enter the instant building, which is a business establishment harmful to juveniles, for the main purpose, and that it should protect the neighboring residents’ residential environment and the educational environment of students, the Defendant issued a disposition of denying the application for change (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. On September 4, 2015, the Information and Communications Industry Promotion Agency notified the Plaintiff of the cancellation of the instant agreement to the effect that “the task is suspended and the agreement is cancelled according to the evaluation committee’s judgment that it is impossible to complete the task within the period of the agreement due to the Defendant’s refusal of use, structural change, etc.” (ii) the Plaintiff filed an objection against the foregoing cancellation notification, but the Information and Communications Industry Promotion Agency filed an objection on October 5, 2015.