The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (two months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant made a confession and reflects the instant crime, and that the Defendant’s closure of the massage place as of October 22, 2014 and the fact that he did not repeat again is favorable.

However, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have much social harm by commercializing women's sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and requires a simple and strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture. The defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million by 70,000,000 after the commission of the act of arranging sexual traffic at the same place even after the commission of the act of arranging sexual traffic was controlled once by the police (this court 2014Da3408), and the defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million again (this court 2014Da3408), and he once once again performs the act of arranging sexual traffic and has the history of regulating the police again, the fact that there was a history of being sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same crime, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age and speculative environment, and the circumstances before and after the crime,

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.