The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of and reflects on the instant crime; (b) while arranging sexual traffic does not have any social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women’s sex; (c) in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture; (d) on October 29, 2014, the Incheon District Court sentenced 4 million won to a fine for violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Incheon District Court’s Branch Branch, which was under trial; and (e) on February 28, 2015, the instant crime was committed while the appellate court was under trial; and (e) on February 28, 2015, even after the instant officetel 509, the instant officetel 313 continued to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic and regulate the traffic; and (e) taking account of the following factors, the Defendant’s age, the Defendant’s age, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime were committed.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.