logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.12.02 2020고정1697
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Oral 49cc.

On July 9, 2020, the Defendant driven the above Oralba on July 16:18, 2020, and led the front road of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C to turn to the left while driving along the two-lanes in the direction of the UAV in the direction of the UAV.

Since there is an intersection where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has the duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by keeping the front line and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle and to prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim E(E, South and 25 years old) driving a 125 cc U.S. where the victim E(E, E, 25 years old) driving at the right turn due to negligence and failed to go to the left at the center, and operated it rapidly. However, the Defendant did not fall short of this and received the front part of the victim's lebane as the front part of the lebane driving by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s occupational negligence, such as salt dynasium and gysium, which require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Photographs related to traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the medical certificate (E);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow