The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (8 months without prison labor) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant was erroneous in the course of the trial, and the victim was crossing the accident of this case without permission. The victim also was responsible for a certain portion of the occurrence of the accident of this case, the Defendant deposited KRW 15 million at the court below for the bereaved family members of the victim, and additionally deposited KRW 5 million at the court below for the first time in the trial, there is no record of the same kind of crime, and the Defendant was subscribed to a comprehensive insurance (person with no record of the same kind of crime).

However, in light of the unfavorable circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the duty of the front-time care and caused a serious result of the death of the victim; that there was a lack of street lamps around the accident road at the time; however, the Defendant was driving at a speed exceeding 10 km (60km) and the victim’s bereaved family members failed to reach agreement with the victim, and that the victim’s bereaved family members want to be punished against the Defendant up to the heart, even if considering some of the changed sentencing grounds in the trial, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit and thus dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.