The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who operates a restaurant under the trade name of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

No person shall sell foods, the import of which is prohibited, or store such foods for sale without filing an import declaration.

Nevertheless, at around 17:15 on June 19, 2014, the Defendant stored in the main workplace and line for the purpose of selling a domestic rice 1 disease and a 1stude 1st class of middle-sea rice imported without filing an import declaration at the main workplace.

2. The Defendant’s assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel experienced difficulties in extinguishing in the country by enjoying most of the time time in the Defendant’s and there are symptoms of change. It is known in China that the rice plant stated in the facts charged is suitable for the above symptoms.

In addition, F puts up the convenience belief stated in the facts charged in the Chinese Rop instead of the Korean Rop, instead of the Korean Rop, even though it is good if it does not want to sell it.

Therefore, the defendant's Monomen in China, and the defendant's Monomenity in the above rice 1st century and the defendant's Monomenity in convenience 1st century.

The fact that the storage place of the above rice-type beginning and the convenience table was the main restaurant room and line of the restaurant as stated in the facts charged is because the defendant's family members and employees' preparation of meals, such as F, use the above restaurant room on the first floor among two main restaurants of the building where the above restaurant is located.

Even on the fourth floor of the above building, gas facilities are not used at all because they are not installed.

In other words, the defendant only stored and used the above rice meal and convenience support belief for F's food cooking, and did not use it for the food cooking for the above restaurant customers, and did not intend to do so.

3. Determination

A. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the following facts are acknowledged.

(1) The Defendant stored one domestic rice meal first and one string of convenience, which was imported without reporting to the main working group and line of the restaurant operated by the Defendant.