logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.11.22 2012가단19199
손해배상(산)
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 55,045,356 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from December 13, 2010 to November 22, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 2009, the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with Defendant B to work in Defendant B (industrial steel structure and powder manufacturing business) for one year, and Defendant C had supplied liquefied petroleum gas to Defendant B’s factory while engaging in liquefied petroleum gas sales business under the name of Defendant B.

B. In the case of Namyang-si, Defendant B built a sealed product using three construction lines for the F-related painting factory (hereinafter “instant painting”). The Plaintiff subsidized I under the direction of G and team leader H, who is a person in charge of painting work, and was in charge of construction work and occupation, fire extinguishing, etc. on the three construction lines.

C. In the above painting factory, the products are cleaned and sealed, and the gas valve was loaded on the building, and the gas valve was cut off with a water tank using the soil to dry, and the temperature gauge attached to the dried side was cut off on about 180 degrees, and the gas valve was cut off by ice (ordinary 38 minutes walk) on the dried side, and then the products were dried by opening a door after about 10 minutes.

After undergoing education on painting, building, internal arrangement, ignition, temperature body, etc., the Plaintiff mainly takes charge of ancillary work, such as washing and painting work, and putting the goods on 3 as the building site, and melting them into a dry product. D.

On March 21, 2009, at around 09:00, the Plaintiff and I opened a gas valve to build the electric power distribution unit case to be shipped by I from the building of No. 3, and attempted to load and process the goods on the building of No. 3, but did not properly extinguish the gas, or gas was leaked due to fire extinguishing. The Plaintiff and I completed the building process from the building of No. 2.

arrow