1. The defendant dated June 29, 2015, as to each share of 1,323/39,533 among the real estate listed in attached Table 1 of the list to the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

(a)F and G have married one another (the plaintiff and the defendant) under his chain;

B. On April 28, 2005, F donated 1,323/3,041 shares among the real estate No. 1 of this case, which was owned by G, and F completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of G on April 30, 2005.

C. G on September 20, 2006, title 1,323/3,041 of the instant real estate No. 1, which is its sole property to the Defendant.

It is the share of real estate donated by F as described in the subsection.

He donated B, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the defendant on September 28, 2006 with respect to the above real estate shares. D.

F on November 19, 2013, F is the first real estate of this case owned by a notary public under the No. 532 of 1,718/3,041 shares among the first real estate owned by the notary public of this case as of November 19, 2013.

1,323/3,041 shares, other than the shares, given to G, as described in paragraph (1).

In addition, a testamentary document (No. 1) stating that the second real estate of this case will be bequeathed to the defendant was prepared.

E. G died on February 1, 2015, and F died on April 21, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, Eul evidence 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion

A. Since the deceased G was in violation of the plaintiffs' legal reserve of inheritance by donating all shares of 1,323/3,041 of the real estate No. 1 of this case, which is one of its own property before the birth, to the defendant, the defendant is obligated to implement the procedure for registration of ownership transfer (i.e., share 1,323/3,041 x 1/13) of the real estate No. 1 of this case as a return of legal reserve of inheritance to the plaintiffs.

B. Meanwhile, it is null and void as it is not in accordance with the method of will prescribed by the Civil Act, where the netF bequeathed shares 1,718/3,041 of the instant real estate No. 1 and the instant real estate No. 2 to the Defendant. Thus, the Defendant is against the Plaintiffs each of the portion of inheritance of the Plaintiffs among the instant real estate No. 1,718/15.