The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On November 13, 2015, at around 20:45, the Defendant’s summary of the facts charged is “E” for the operation of the Victim D(56) in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon. At the victim’s right side, the Defendant’s leakage of the Defendant, who operates a chickens house, and the victim’s right to appeal that the victim’s collisions as a matter of collision with the usual boundary of the usual store, and the victim’s right to appeal that the victim’s failure to sell the dissolved after the business hours end;

Mansan, knife, knife, knife, and knife, knife, and threatened the victim.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor was proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the defendant was a threat of harm and injury likely to cause fear to the victim.

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

A. As evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, there are statements made to the victim, F and G investigative agencies, and testimony in this court.

(b) The aggrieved person was a victim who, at an investigative agency, tried to see himself/herself by means of depression;

was stated.

However, in this Court, it is how the victim has become a victim of CCTV images on the basis that there is no heading of the defendant's friendly acid.

defense counsel's question, the defendant has a provoking in the future, and the defendant does not leave the video.

The answer was made.

Since then, whether the counsel's "does not conduct that the defendant intends to write a witness due to friendlyness" is not a behavior to put a witness.

“The victim testified to the question that “the victim testified that “the Defendant was fluoring, fluoring, and obsing him.”

As above, it is considerably important to determine whether a defendant was intending to commit an act in Domination at the time of the above Domination, but the victim's statement is not consistent, and thus it is difficult to believe it easily.