1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Under the Plaintiff’s name, the mobile telephone subscription contract and the mobile terminal subscription contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with each of the following terms and conditions between Defendant El branch, the Intervenor’s assistant case, and the case (hereinafter “the instant contract”) were concluded and the telephone number was allocated.

On June 12, 2012, Defendant LAD B B on June 21, 2012, Defendant LAD C 3 on June 12, 2012, and supplementary participant E on June 13, 2012

B. The written contract with Defendant El branch contains each of the bank accounts in the name of the Plaintiff (F, June 12, 2012) and the new bank account (G, June 21, 2012) with the automatic transfer of telecommunications charges for each of the aforementioned mobile phones. The contact address of the Plaintiff is as follows: H used for the previous supplementary participant case by the contact address is as stated in the above written contract as of June 12, 2012; B is as stated in the above written contract as of June 21, 2012; and the copy of the Plaintiff’s driver’s license is attached respectively.

C. The contract with the supplementary intervenor EK contains an entry of the Plaintiff’s bank account (F) in the name of the Plaintiff by automatic transfer of the communications fee of mobile phone, and the contact address is indicated, and a copy of the Plaintiff’s driver’s license is attached.

In the contract with the supplementary intervenor, the automatic transfer of the telecommunication fee in mobile phone is written by the bank account in the name of the plaintiff, and the contact point is written by H, and each copy of the plaintiff's driver's license and the certificate of personal seal issued by the principal is attached to the contract on the day immediately before the contract date.

E. On the other hand, Defendant ELS and the supplementary intervenor KS’s mobile phone security deposits against the Plaintiff, which were acquired by transfer of the mobile phone security deposits against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the supplementary intervenor 1 card”) and the supplementary intervenor case between the Defendant and the Seoul Guarantee Insurance at the time of the conclusion of each contract of this case.