1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 31, 2012, Internet shopping mall 11, in the Plaintiff’s name, purchased two mobile phone units by visiting the site, and drafted an online subscription application with the content that the Defendant subscribed to the mobile communications service.

The above online subscription application contains the Plaintiff’s name, resident registration number, and mobile phone to the address to which they are delivered, the Plaintiff’s new bank account number (C) is indicated as the Plaintiff’s account for payment of charges, and the contact column is indicated as “D”.

B. In order to join the Defendant’s mobile communications service via the Internet, the Defendant’s entry of detailed information on the real name of the consent of the terms and conditions (the procedure for consent to settlement for the payment of the price is in progress) (a certified certificate or credit card) must be conducted.

C. On May 31, 2012, using the Plaintiff’s credit card information, the Plaintiff’s identification was conducted in 11:30:13, 11:37:41 on May 31, 201, and the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate was sent. As a copy of the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate was sent, a mobile phone number service contract and a mobile phone installment sales contract (hereinafter “instant contract”). D.

Plaintiff’s bank account with respect to one of the above mobile phones, KRW 17,876, June 22, 2012;

6. 27. 38,524 won, and 374,973 won on July 4, 2013 were paid.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, evidence Nos. 1 through 11, 13, purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Judgment on the parties’ assertion

A. Although the company that was delegated by the Plaintiff’s assertion to collect claims from the Defendant urged the Plaintiff to pay the communications fee, there is no obligation to pay the communications fee against the Defendant.

B. The instant contract was duly concluded with the Plaintiff through the identification process using the Plaintiff’s credit card information asserted by the Defendant, and the Framework Act on Electronic Documents and Transactions (hereinafter “Electronic Document Act”).

(A) there is good reason to believe that the instant contract was lawfully concluded in accordance with Article 7(2) of the Act.

2.