logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.03.28 2017가단10132
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Appendix 1, 2, 3, 4 and 1, among the buildings indicated in the Annexed Real Estate.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions and arguments in Gap evidence 1 through 5, the Plaintiff leased each of the lease deposit amounting to KRW 20 million, KRW 120,000,000,000 from May 1, 2014 to April 30, 2016, the Plaintiff and the defendant raised the rent amount of KRW 1430,000 and extended the lease period of the above lease period of KRW 20,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00.

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to order the Plaintiff to use the instant building and return unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of KRW 1310,000 per month from June 1, 2016 to October 31, 2017, which is the sum of the rent in arrears of KRW 2,1310,00 (the amount calculated by deducting the rent of KRW 2,4310,00 which is the amount equivalent to the rent between 17 months and the rent of KRW 3,00,000 which has been paid during the above period), which is the remainder after deducting the said lease deposit, from the rent of KRW 1.31,00 and the rent of KRW 1,433,00 per month from November 1, 2017 to the completion date

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified and accepted.

arrow