logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.04.06 2018고정120
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of a motor vehicle Bing agreement.

The driver of any motor vehicle shall not change course when it is likely to impede the normal traffic of other motor vehicles, except in extenuating circumstances, such as the prevention of danger, etc., nor shall he/she drive any motor vehicle rapidly, and shall not drive any motor vehicle in distress that threatens or inflicts any harm on other persons or causes any danger to traffic continuously or repeatedly.

Nevertheless, at around 06:50 on October 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) operated the cambling agreement vehicle in front of the camburg in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, along the three-lanes; (b) was likely to obstruct the normal passage of the camburging vehicle that is driven by the victim C with the four-lanes; (c) was changed the course to the four-lanes of the above camburg without using a direction device; and (d) did not inevitable cases, such as the prevention of danger that the victim would continuously turn on the camburg; and (d) the camburg operated the steering system and the brake system to avoid drilling in order to avoid drilling; and (e) was stopped by the victim of the camburging at 180 degrees in the reverse direction.

As a result, the defendant committed a violation of the duty of prohibition of career change and the duty of prohibition of rapid operation, thereby threatening the victim and causing danger to traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Report on internal investigation (the summary, etc. of the reporter's statement) and investigation status (examination of video records of black boxes installed on damaged vehicles);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing national newspapers and contact with people;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 151-2, 46-3 and 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act, selection of fines concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the Defendant’s crime of this case.

arrow