logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.03.18 2020고정1226
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The facts charged are driving of Crac vehicles, and the defendant are those who buy each class of driving trucks in D-wing and III Plus.

On September 3, 2020, the Defendant driven an above cargo vehicle around 18:00 and proceeded along the intersection of the shooting distance between the front and front of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul along one-lane from the south of the Olympic Winter to the intersection of the shooting distance between the south of the Olympic Winter.

Since there is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed in the front bank, there was a duty of care to safely drive the driver in accordance with the signals by reducing speed for the driver and by properly examining the right and the right of the front and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and even if the signal, etc. had already been changed to yellow signal before entering the intersection, the Defendant’s negligence of disregarding and straighting it, thereby proceeding along the intersection, thereby in violation of the signal at the three-lanes like the direction of the Defendant’s running, and as is, going to cross the intersection, stated the part of the victim B (30 h) going to cross the intersection in the indictment on the right side of the vehicle above, in order to walk to the right side of the vehicle above, while the part of the above part of the victim B (30 h) driving to cross the intersection, the Defendant stated “on the right side of the vehicle above the right side of the vehicle above,” but according to B’s statement and CD images, the charge is corrected as above.

was received as such.

Ultimately, Defendant 2 suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence.

2. According to the following circumstances acknowledged based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the defendant was at fault on duty.

There is insufficient evidence to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

A. The Defendant was proceeding one lane to turn to the right at the intersection.

Before the defendant enters the intersection, the left turn signal has already been yellow.

arrow