logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.08 2013노2416
상해등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) at the time and place as indicated in the judgment of the court below, the Defendant only received the victim’s head to defend himself by assaulting the victim E at the end of vision; and (b) the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged despite having committed an act of injury as stated in the judgment of the court below, is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts; and (c) the fine (one million won) is too unreasonable

2. 판단 피해자 E는 수사기관과 원심 법정에서 피고인의 가해행위에 대하여 구체적이고 일관되게 진술하고 있고, 피해자와 게임장 코인을 넣어주는 문제로 시비가 되어 먼저 원심 판시 똑딱이를 들고 피해자를 때리려고 했었고, 그후 피해자의 멱살을 잡고 몸싸움을 하다가 피해자의 이마를 들이받기도 하였다는 피고인의 진술도 피해자의 진술과 일부 부합되며, 피해자 및 현장 사진의 영상에 의하면 피해자가 두피 열상을 입었음을 인정할 수 있는바, 이들 증거를 종합하면 원심 판시 상해 범죄사실을 넉넉히 인정할 수 있고, 원심판결에 사실오인의 위법이 없다

(In full view of the occurrence, process, degree of mutual damage, etc. of the crime of this case, the crime of this case cannot be deemed to have been committed as a last resort without any reasonable means to protect one’s legal interests or otherwise. Furthermore, the Defendant denied the crime of this case, did not have any agreement with the victim, and the Defendant did not have to recover from damage or have reached an agreement with the victim. In addition, the lower court’s punishment is not deemed to be excessively unreasonable in full view of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow