The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal of this case was posted under the name of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee, and the Defendant was present at the meeting of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee, but the Defendant did not participate in the preparation and attachment of the Emergency Countermeasure Committee at all because he did not know about the progress of the meeting during the Do and the accurate contents of the meeting.

The content of the instant reports is merely a mere expression of opinion, not a statement of fact.

2. First of all, the judgment of the court below is based on the following circumstances revealed in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, the defendant, at the court of the court below, stated that the defendant did not have any ever participated in the preparation and attachment of the instant substitute report at the court of the court below, and the defendant reversed the statement that there was no satisfy in the process of forming and attaching the instant substitute report at the court of the court below, and at the time of the prosecutor's investigation, "the instant substitute report at the court of the court below was prepared and printed by using computers located in the B 1st underground floor Nstore office around January 26, 2018, and the attachment was low." The defendant prepared and attached the instant substitute report at the bottom of the court of the court below, stating that there was no specific statement that "the defendant was a satisfyer," and that "the defendant did not have any disadvantage in the process of forming an emergency countermeasure committee for the management of the victim."