logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.06.20 2013고단2937
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daegu District Court on June 8, 2012, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Daegu Detention House on December 15, 2012.

1. On January 11, 2013, Defendant A posted a sales letter stating, “Poppoppoppoppoppoppoppops, 600 Kapets,” on the above Kapets bulletin board, which connects NAVD to the PC located in the Nam-gu Daegu-gu Daegu-gu Largepoppops.

However, even if the defendant receives the purchase price from the victims, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the 600D Kameras.

On January 11, 2013, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving victims; (b) transferred KRW 500,000 to the Daegu Bank account in the name of the Defendant; (c) transferred KRW 300,000 to the Daegu Bank account in the name of the Defendant to the Daegu Bank account on January 14, 2013; (d) received KRW 300,000 from the victim F, who reported and contacted the said comments to the Daegu Bank account in the name of the Defendant on January 20, 2013; and (e) received KRW 300,000 from the victim G who reported and contacted the said comments to the Daegu Bank account in the name of the Defendant and

2. The Defendants, as a co-principal, expressed a false letter of intent to sell goods in NAVD page, and received the purchase price from the victims to use it as entertainment expenses, etc.

On February 5, 2013, at the PC room located in the Daegu Suwon-dong, the Defendants posted a sales letter "LETV Sheet Sheet" on the said Kapet bulletin board, with access to the NAVD D.

However, even if the defendant receives the purchase price from the victims, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the PETV.

As such, the Defendants conspired to induce victims, and received 250,000 won from the victim H to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under Defendant B, which reported the above comments around February 5, 2013.

arrow