logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2018.09.17 2017고정388
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 05, 2017, at around 23:40, the Defendant opened a D hotel located in Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and it seems that the Defendant returned the two weeks ordered by Defendant’s daily driving to the Defendant, and as the Defendant returned the two weeks ordered by the victim E (57 taxes and South) who is a hotel manager, and the Defendant stated that “I would like to be why the personnel is not available.”

"I" and "I" arrive at the same boarding and unloading of elevators attached to Si expenses and the first floor street.

After the elevator door was opened, the Defendant: (a) knee knee knee was marked on the floor in the course of coming back and moving out of the parking lot; and (b) kne knee was inflicted on the victim, who is in need of treatment for about two weeks, such as knee, right shoulder, right knee, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Some of the statements made by the police in relation to E;

1. The defendant asserts that the injured CCTV video (the defendant only saw that the victim was sacriffed so as not to attract himself/herself by getting off his/her elevator, and that it is a legitimate act.

According to the above evidence, unlike the defendant's assertion, the elevator door was open, and the defendant was knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

The defendant's act does not constitute a justifiable act, and as seen below, the defendant suffered an injury by suffering an assault from a victim in the course of disputing with the victim in the elevator in the elevator.

Even if the defendant's act after this does not constitute a passive resistance.

Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit.

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow