The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaged in construction business.

On August 10, 2015, at around 17:30, the Defendant assaulted the victim C (the age of 49) in front of the Twon Traurg, a road 117 Doh, a road, 143 Doh on August 17:17, 2015, on the ground that the victim C (the age of 49) was rash from the road above the road.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the facts charged of this case cannot be prosecuted against the victim's explicit intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to C's statement of withdrawal of complaint, the victim C can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on May 10, 2016, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.