A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for an occupational breach of trust at the Suwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on July 19, 2014.

1. On September 3, 2012, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would resell to 23 million won until December 3, 2012, the right to purchase eight square meters in the site for livelihood countermeasures in the area for a housing site development, if he purchases at 18 million won the right to purchase eight square meters in the subway station near the subway station in Ansan-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si.”

However, the Defendant did not know E of the fact that there was no delegation from the actual owner E of the above right to sell and purchase, and there was no intention or ability to transfer the right to sell and purchase even after receiving the money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received money from the victim on November 1, 200,000 won from the said false statement.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On August 8, 2012, the Defendant stated that “Around 2015, the Defendant would purchase a right to sell a housing site area developed by the Housing Corporation within one month and resell the right to sell the housing site area, and return the principal with the profits therefrom,” at the G office of the Defendant’s management company, G office, and the victim H.

However, in fact, when the defendant received money from the victim, he was scheduled to use it for other purposes such as repayment of debts, etc., and he purchased and reselled the right of sale for no other property at the time, and there was no intention or ability to pay the principal and profits to

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 2,8960,000 won from the victim, namely, 2,8960,000 won from the victim, and 3,5 million won from September 27, 2012, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and H;

1. A written agreement on investment return, and