logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고단3152
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On October 20, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Suwon District Court on August 20, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 28, 2010.

[2014 Highest 3152 Criminal facts] The Defendant was the owner of dry field (area 1,611 square meters) located in Seosung-si C, and was using the building as a factory by constructing a building without farming houses on the above farmland, and did not reside in the relevant area, so the Defendant was not eligible to receive eight square meters in the land for daily countermeasures from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation in relation to the land compensation in the Seosung-dong 2 District.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Sungsung-si D around July 2, 2007, concluded that “A victim F has eight square meters in a living countermeasure site in Dongtan-2, but if heged this, he may earn a profit of KRW 37 million within two to three years,” and that he received a monetary sum of KRW 37 million from the victim as the purchase price in the above living countermeasure site.”

[2] Around December 8, 2007, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the “H Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office” in the Defendant’s operation in Hasung-si, G, that the victim I purchased a commercial building on the basis of an unconditioned allocation of eight square meters to B, and that it would sell it to 45 million won.”

However, the Defendant reported the transfer of the “H Licensed Real Estate Agent” on October 31, 2006, which was after June 12, 2006, the standard business day, and only after October 31, 2006. At that time, the Defendant could not be selected as a person subject to livelihood countermeasures who received business compensation due to the lack of available business compensation, and there was no lack of confirmation on whether the person is subject to livelihood measures in the Korea Land and Housing Corporation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 45 million from the victim as the price for the transfer of the daily life countermeasure site on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

[Attachment 2014 Highest 3152]

arrow