1. The Defendant’s KRW 12,746,811 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from February 18, 2008 to June 25, 2014.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On July 16, 2001, the Plaintiff acquired national technical qualifications as an automobile maintenance technician and engaged in the automobile maintenance business from around September 11, 2006, and was in charge of automobile maintenance work in C operated by the Defendant from around September 11, 2006. (2) On February 18, 2008, the Plaintiff was performing automobile maintenance work in the foregoing C, which was carrying out the automobile maintenance work with D and rolling stock attachment work, but the Plaintiff and D met with the part of the Plaintiff’s shoulder while attaching the automobile at hand.

(3) From February 19, 2008 to April 29, 2008, the following day after the instant accident occurred, the Plaintiff was subject to pharmacologic treatment, physical therapy, etc. from E E E regularly out of the date of the instant accident. The Plaintiff was under medical treatment from Korea University Guro Hospital anesthesia, from July 15, 2008 to September 10, 2012 from Korea National University Periodical Department. The Plaintiff was under medical treatment from the F Hospital to the date of the instant accident, from the date of the instant accident, to the date of the instant accident, to the date of the instant accident, the Plaintiff conducted the instant accident, and the Plaintiff’s medical treatment from the date of the instant accident, to the date of the instant accident, to the date of the instant accident, to the date of the instant research and development, and to the date of the instant research and development, and the Plaintiff took part in Seoul National University Hospital Doro Hospital 2009 to the right ke, the Plaintiff’s physical therapy 1 to 28 Em.

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant provided the plaintiff with tools that can safely install a vehicle which is a heavy object, and specifically educate and supervise the work methods for the prevention of the accident, but the accident of this case occurred due to negligence that caused the accident of this case. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the damage suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

C. On the other hand, limitation of liability;