1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 8, 2012, while serving as the daily wood hole belonging B from around June 2012, the Plaintiff was faced with an accident that was removed from the strawing with the strawing of the straws while performing the strawing work at the stick on June 22, 2012 (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On August 10, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on August 10, 2012, “the Defendant filed a medical care application with the Defendant for the instant medical care benefits “the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for “the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the following reasons: (a) the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application for the reasons that the instant medical care application for the instant medical care application was not recognized (hereinafter “the instant medical care application”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, 9, 12-15, Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion had no pain or treatment on the right shoulder before the accident of this case. In light of the circumstances and contents of the accident of this case and the degree of injury, etc., the plaintiff suffered the injury of this case due to the accident of this case, which constitutes an occupational accident, and thus, the disposition of this case against this should be revoked as it is unlawful.

B. 1) On June 22, 2012, the Plaintiff was engaged in the crypting work at a construction site located in Kimhae-si C around 13:16 on June 22, 2012.