The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Defendant reflects his/her mistake, and is recognized as having relatively small profits from the instant crime.

However, the crime of Bosing is not easy to detect and arrest because the law of the crime is organized, intelligent, and it is very big social harm caused by it as it is difficult to prevent damage, and in order to eradicate the crime of Bosing, it is necessary to take a strong response to the actors who participated in the form of aiding and abetting even though it is necessary to eradicate the crime of Bosing.

In addition, the Defendant had been punished by a fine or imprisonment with prison labor due to the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and even though he clearly perceived that he was involved in the crime of Bosing, he did not commit the crime of aiding and abetting fraud.

In addition, taking into account all the factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, family relations, growth background, and criminal history, the sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant is not heavy.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.