The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the court below is just in maintaining the judgment of the court of first instance that the preparation of a private document and the exercise of a private document prepared for qualification in each of the facts charged in the instant case against the defendant constitutes concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and it did not err in the misapprehension of legal principles as to comprehensive crimes and concurrent crimes, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, the defendant violated the Constitution, laws, orders, and rules or erred by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, on the cover of the grounds for appeal.

Since the phrase “ merely stated as “,” and did not state specific reasons therefor, it cannot be deemed as a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.