logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.6.8.선고 2016도14367 판결
절도,주거침입
Cases

2016Do14367 thief and intrusion upon residence

Defendant

A

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney L (Korean national ship)

The judgment below

Seoul Western District Court Decision 2016No374 Decided August 25, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

June 8, 2017

Text

The judgment below is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Seoul Western District Court.

Reasons

1. Judgment on the grounds of appeal

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, death penalty, imprisonment with or without prison labor for life or for not less than ten years.

Inasmuch as an appeal based on unreasonable sentencing is allowed only on a case on which the decision was rendered, the appeal against the Defendant is more.

In this case where minor punishment has been imposed, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is legitimate appeal.

shall not become a reason.

2. Ex officio determination

A. According to Article 323(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, facts constituting an offense and evidence in the grounds for the judgment of conviction

The summary of the judgment and the application of the law shall be specified, and the reasons for the judgment of conviction shall be specified

Where any one of them is omitted, it shall affect the judgment prescribed in Article 383 subparagraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

8. As a matter of course, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the grounds of reversal (Supreme Court Decision 2010Do9151 Decided October 14, 2010).

see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision

B. According to the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court accepted the Defendant’s appeal of unfair sentencing.

The judgment of the court of first instance is reversed, and the defendant is convicted, and the judgment is without merit.

the first instance judgment which only cited the criminal facts and summary of evidence and omitted the application of the law in its entirety.

The room can be known, which is erroneous in violation of the law.

3. Conclusion

The lower judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the lower court for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.

We conclude that it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Judges

The presiding judge shall keep the record of the Justice

Chief Justice Park Jong-young

Justices Kim Jae-in

arrow