logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2019.07.18 2018고단1616
사기등
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On March 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fabrication of private documents in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court on December 24, 2015, and was released as a release on bail on December 24, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 5, 2016, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on the same day, and the execution of the sentence is based on the final and conclusive judgment (Article 459 of the Criminal Procedure Act). Therefore, if the number of days pending trial is included in the term of punishment at the time the judgment became final and conclusive, and no sentence to be

On June 5, 2018, the Daegu District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for a special assault in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on June 13, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 13, 2018, and on November 9, 2018, the Ulsan District Court was sentenced to two years and four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 15, 2019.

The defendant of "2018 Godan1616" had a mind to purchase and open a mobile phone in the name of B, which is the same for the purpose of selling mobile phone devices without any intention to use even if he/she purchases or opens a mobile phone using his/her driver's license and resident registration certificate under the name of B,

1. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On December 28, 2015, the Defendant presented B’s driver’s license to open “B” and “B” in the applicant column for a new application without obtaining B’s consent from his/her birth in the Daegu Suwon-gu mobile phone agency (referring to 69,800 won at the market price) and used B’s license to open the E mobile phone in the name of B without obtaining B’s consent from his/her birth. In addition, the Defendant issued the application for joining the mobile phone as if it was a document duly formed.

B. On January 13, 2016, the Defendant opened a gallon phone in B’s name with the consent of B at the “H” mobile phone agency located in Daegu Northern-gu G without the consent of B. B. In order to open the J mobile phone in B’s name (c. 89,800 won at the market price).

arrow