beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The plaintiff entered the Army on March 8, 1984 and was discharged from military service on September 11, 1986.
B. On June 17, 2017, when the Plaintiff was serving in the military on April 17, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) laid off a large brut coal from the side; (b) turned out a sound from ear to ear; and (c) applied for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State or persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that the scopical and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scops
C. In other words, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration with the same purport as the first disposition in around 2018, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s instant wounds are not likely to have proximate causal relation with military duties or education and training, the Defendant rendered a non-applicable decision on the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on July 16, 2019 following a resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement.
A. [In the absence of dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in Gap's Evidence Nos. 1, 6, 7, 8, and Eul's Evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. Plaintiff’s assertion 1) In a physical examination related to enlistment in force on February 25, 1983, the Plaintiff received class A’s physical grade. It is not recorded that the Plaintiff was “a person who has no mental disorder or mental disorder, and whose evaluation criteria according to the degree of illness and mental disorder are in Grade I,” and there is no record that there is anything that there is anything wrong with opportune in relation to opportune. After entering the military, the Plaintiff was assigned to the 50 group of 15 group of 15 group of 1984 group and was assigned to the 50 group of 50 group of 1984 group of 15 group of 15 group of 1984 group of 190 group of 15 group of 15 group of 1984 group of 190 group of 15 group of 15 group of 1984 group of 19