1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s military service entered the Army on September 17, 1984, but was diagnosed on February 25, 1985 by the B Hospital No. 4-5 of the No. 1985, and was discharged from military service on April 18, 1985.

B. Around December 31, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State with the different application form for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State, claiming that “the highest volunteer in the military service caused the escape from the memorial signboard in the military due to the fact that the highest volunteer in the military was influence in front of the internal base base during the military service,” and that he applied for the registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State. However, on April 5, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the amount equivalent to the difference between the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State and persons who have rendered distinguished service to the State (the injury in the line of duty) and the persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (the injury in the line of duty) on May 2, 2013, the Plaintiff applied again to the Defendant for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State.

However, on September 27, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff constitutes a person who rendered distinguished services to the State (or a person injured on duty) and a person eligible for veteran's compensation (a person injured on a disaster) differently.

3) Although the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the disposition rendered by the Seoul Administrative Court on September 29, 2013, the dismissal judgment became final and conclusive (Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2014Gudan697 decided August 21, 2015, Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu56122 decided September 28, 2016, Supreme Court Decision 2015Nu56122 decided Sept. 28, 2016, Supreme Court Decision 2016 Decided Dec. 23, 2016; hereinafter the above). However, the procedure of the lawsuit becomes “previous procedure” (hereinafter referred to as “previous procedure”).

(1) On February 13, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that the Plaintiff applied for the escape certificate of signboards and legs to the Defendant. (2) On May 1, 2017, the Defendant rendered the following decisions on the said application:

In the following below, the "disposition of this case" is added to the decision on the portion and the bridge part among the following converging escape certificates.