logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.06.11 2013가합3945
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

Basic Facts

Subject matter of the first contract of this case: No. 301, 501 of the building of this case shall be excluded.

Price: the seller's financial rights [one bank and agricultural cooperatives (hereinafter referred to as "agricultural cooperatives")] out of KRW 9.87 billion;

(1) The Plaintiff and C, while the Plaintiff and C, did not have any deposit to succeed to each of the above units, included the lease deposit calculated in relation to each of the above units, although the Plaintiff and C, at the time of the contract, did not know of whether the Plaintiff and C were aware of it at the time of the contract. However, the Plaintiff and C, as to each of the above units, the Plaintiff and C were to succeed to the obligation to return the lease deposit amount of KRW 6.130 million and the obligation to return the lease deposit amount of KRW 2.543 billion (the Defendant, from among the instant buildings, KRW 101, 102, 103, and 110).

The down payment of KRW 150 million shall be paid at the time of the contract and the balance of KRW 1 billion shall be paid at the time of November 30, 2010.

On September 29, 2010, the Plaintiff, along with C, agreed with the Defendant to purchase the Jung-gu building D (hereinafter “instant building”) which is an aggregate building in the amount of KRW 9.8773 billion (hereinafter “the instant sales contract”). On the date of conclusion of the instant first contract, the Plaintiff paid the Defendant the down payment of KRW 150 million and KRW 250 million as part of the remainder on November 11, 201, respectively.

Of the instant building, the letter of confirmation No. 107, 108, 109, and 203 singing rooms by the due date for the remainder payment, and the Chinese house No. 101, 102, 103, and 110 is subject to the seller’s business for at least one year in accordance with the contract.

Any balance is KRW 950 million, which is the remainder after deducting KRW 100 million from KRW 1.05 billion.

If the above promise is implemented, the buyer does not raise any objection.

After the conclusion of the first contract of this case, the monthly rent on the above 101, 102, 103, and 110 operated by the defendant as a cafeteria of China.

arrow