2016Gohap1173 A. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Good Offices)

6)

(b) Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act;

(c) Violence;

(d) Intimidation;

(e) Violence teachers;

1.(a)(c) A;

2.(a) B

3.(c)(d)(e)(C);

Park Woo-won (prosecution), Kim Jong-sung, and Katho (Public trial)

Attorney D (National Election for Defendant A)

Law Firm E (Defendant B)

[Defendant-Appellee]

Law Firm G (for Defendant C)

[Defendant-Appellant]

March 17, 2017

Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for a maximum term of two years and six months, short term of two years, Defendant B’s imprisonment for a term of three years and six months, and Defendant C’s imprisonment for a term of four years.

The Defendants shall order the Defendants to complete the education course for the prevention of commercial sex acts for 120 hours.

The defendant A shall be forfeited one cell phone (No. 1) of the seized TG UN LA mobile phone.

Criminal History Office

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

Defendant C and Defendant B are friendships, Defendant A and the Defendants conspired with each other to raise money by arranging sexual traffic through hosting events to provide accommodations to female juveniles who live together with entertainment expenses, etc. in order to prepare entertainment expenses.

Defendant C provided funds and accommodation necessary for arranging sexual traffic, managed the sexual traffic to prevent them from escape, and controlled the sexual traffic mediation business by allowing them to do so, and Defendant B and Defendant A lived with the sexual traffic juveniles and managed them in the night, thereby having them do the role of managing them.

From July 28, 2016 to October 19, 2016, Defendants prepared accommodations in the building 201 located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, building 3 located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul Gangnam-gu, building 1 located in K, Busan Shipping Daegu Ltel 308, etc., and arranged sexual traffic by receiving KRW 150,00,00 from the above place of the victim M (W, 16 years old), N (W, 15 years old), P (n, 14 years old), etc., a female juvenile who was going out of Korea after going out of Korea, by using Q, "T," to attract sexual Nams in the vicinity of the above accommodation, and let them come out to meet with juveniles in the vicinity of the above accommodation, and to arrange sexual traffic by receiving KRW 150,000,000 from the above Juvenile Association as the price for sexual traffic.

As a result, Defendants conspired in collusion to arrange the purchase of sex of children and juveniles for business purposes.

2. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and Defendant B

피고인 B는 2016, 8. 말경 서울 강남구 I에 있는 건물 201호 안에서 성매매 청소년인 피해자 M(여, 16세)가 숙소에서 도망쳤다는 이유로 위 피해자에게 "도망가지 못하게 팔, 다리를 잘라 놓겠다"라고 말하며 막대 모양으로 말아 놓은 신문지를 이용하여 위 피해자의 머리를 3-4회 때리고, 피고인 A은 이에 가담하여 손가락으로 위 피해자의 이마를 약 5회 가량 세게 튕겨 때렸다.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the above victim.

Appellants

On September 2, 2016, the Defendant discovered the victim M (the age of 16) who was absent from the entrance and escaped from the front of the exit area No. 2 in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 310, and the victim escaped, and assaulted the victim one time as a hand, on the ground that the victim escaped, and the victim escaped.

4. Defendant C

(a) Violence;

1) On September 2016, the Defendant, within the scope of the building underground of the building located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul J on September 3, 2016, stated that “A victim A (the 17-year-old age), expressed that “I would not bring much money to the juveniles of sexual traffic,” and used the victim as “I would not go to this day? I would like to see why I would go to this end?” and assault the victim at one time on the part of the above victim’s reputation.

2) On January 10, 2016, around 19, the Defendant assaulted the said victim by a method that the said victim, who was seated in a bed with the victim B (the age of 19) on the ground that the said victim could not properly manage sexual traffic, on the ground that he did not properly manage sexual traffic. This assaulted the said victim by a method that the said victim sawd on the part of the said victim, which was cited on the part of the said victim.

(b) Intimidation;

around September 2016, the Defendant threatened the victims B (19 years of age) and A (17 years of age) under the ground of the building located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul High Court in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with the phrase “if so, he/she goes to go to and report to the house for a long time with the other people’s speech. If his/her name was changed in relation to this case, the Defendant threatened the victims.”

(c) Violence teachers;

On October 10, 2016, around the new wall on October 10, 2016, the Defendant became a victim (17 years of age), female-friendly job offers S, and B in front of the house of the Defendant in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

The defendant argued with the above victim and stated that S would report the arrangement of commercial sex acts between A, C, and B to the police", and ordered B to "A to "I have caused only to the police because it became four times", and caused the above B to take about about 10 face of the above victim by hand floor and drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant instigated B to assault the above victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A and C's partial statement

1. The statements of witnesses and U in the first trial records;

1. Each statement made by the witness N,O and V in the second protocol of the trial;

1. The statements made by witnesses A and B in the third protocol of trial;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the defendant A and B;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of M;

1. Each police statement to N,O, V, and U;

1. Each statement of N and W;

1. Investigation report (the relevance of the suspect C's case), investigation report (K and the contractor's confirmation), and internal investigation report (on-site search - accommodation tracking in which the victim has stayed with the suspect);

1. Each photograph;

1. A copy of real estate contract;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 15(1)2 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Article 30 (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: Article 15(1)2 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Article 30 of the Criminal Act (referring to the referral of child and youth sex trafficking to a business, including the referral thereof), Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of joint assault and the choice of imprisonment)

C. Defendant C: Article 15(1)2 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse; Article 30 of the Criminal Act (a comprehensive arrangement of child and juvenile sexual traffic committed for business purposes); Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the Criminal Act; Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) and Article 31(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (a)

1. Mitigation of juvenile offenses;

Defendant A: Articles 2 and 60(2) of the Juvenile Act, Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

(a) Defendant A: Aggravation of concurrent crimes within the scope of adding up the long-term punishments of each of the crimes prescribed in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act to the punishment prescribed in the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which is the largest penalty;

(b) Defendant B: Aggravation of concurrent crimes within the scope of adding up the long-term punishment of the above two crimes as stipulated in the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act to the extent that the punishment of Article 37 of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse is more severe

(c) Defendant C: Aggravation of concurrent crimes within the scope of adding up the punishment prescribed in the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act to the maximum penalty prescribed in the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which is the largest penalty;

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Code (The following consideration shall be taken into account in favor of the reasons for sentencing)

1. Illegal punishment;

Defendant A: Articles 2 and 60(1) of the Juvenile Act

1. Order to complete programs;

The main sentence of Article 21(2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse

1. Confiscation;

Defendant A: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act

Judgment on the Defendants and their defense counsel's arguments

1. Defendant A

A. Summary of the assertion

Defendant A, who got N's capital at the time, was the victim's M and the dispute occurred with the victim's M and brought about to the victim's hand, but the victim did not go against.

B. Determination

The victim M was called to be a pro-friendly test when entering a bridge and a cell phone with the 'A' due to the fact that it is difficult for the police to do so, and it was called to be a friendly test (the 15th page of the evidence record), and at that time, prior to reporting, the victim M was faced with the scambucks that caused the scam to be strictly scam and that it made the scam to do so. The defendant A and his defense counsel do not accept the above victim's assertion because he assaulted him on the ground that he tolds the scam to the scam (31st page of the evidence record). In light of the fact that the defendant A and his defense counsel did not have any reason to make the above victim false statement, it is recognized that the above victim was abused as stated in the criminal facts in the judgment of the defendant A.

2. Defendant B

A. Summary of the assertion

Although there is a fact that Defendant B arranged sexual traffic as stated in the facts of the crime No. 1, it cannot be said that it is "business".

(b) Relevant legal principles;

“A certain day” means continuing to repeat the same act. Determination of whether an act constitutes the same ought to be made according to social norms by comprehensively taking into account various circumstances, such as repetition and continuity of the act, existence of business nature, etc., purpose and scale, frequency, period, and mode of conduct. Furthermore, the same act continues to be repeated, as well as in the case of repeated continuation of the act, if the act was committed with the intention of repeated continuation, it may constitute a single act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2003Do935, Jun. 13, 2003; 2012Do4390, Jul. 12, 2012).

C. Determination

Examining the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, namely, the process and method of arranging the sexual traffic by Defendant B, the frequency and period of arranging the sexual traffic, the acquisition of profits therefrom, the use of the price for sexual traffic and the management form, etc., in light of the above legal principles, Defendant B is deemed to have been “a business under the intention of continuing the act of arranging the sexual traffic of this case.” Accordingly, Defendant B and his defense counsel’s assertion is rejected.

1) Defendant B, along with Defendant A and Defendant C, proposed that the victim M, N,O, P, etc., who are runaway juveniles in need of living expenses without a certain residence, engaged in commercial sex acts, first of all. Accordingly, Defendant B entered into a contract for accommodation in its name in order to prepare a lodging place for resolving the board and lodging of the above victims, and supervised and managed the accommodation in that place together with the above victims, and established a plan for specific commercial sex acts (including the frequency of daily commercial sex acts, the price, and the specific method of implementation), and committed commercial sex acts against the above victims.

2) Defendant B, through the mobile phone-based cell phone clock " Q, contacted persons with many unspecified persons, colored them, set the conditions, prices, etc. of commercial sex acts, and mediated the victims to have sexual intercourse with their sexual intercourses by allowing them to leave the designated places. The period of such sexual sex acts is about two months or more, and the number of times seems to have reached two months or more.

3) In order to prepare for the escape of the victims, Defendant B received the previous mobile phone used by the victims, and made the victims use the mobile phone which has not been opened. Moreover, Defendant B made efforts to continuously maintain the instant sexual traffic mediation activities by installing a location tracking system, etc. in advance on the mobile phone paid to the victims, and by finding out the victims of escape and engaging them back and engaging in sexual traffic.

4) Defendant B engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic of this case for the sole purpose of pursuing profit without a certain occupation, which seems to have been due to the fact that the above Defendant had the need to continuously procure living expenses, etc. while leaving home. Meanwhile, Defendant B received sexual traffic payment from the victims, and did not pay the victims other than the amount of accommodation.

5) Defendant B moved 4 times or more to avoid the crackdown of the investigative agency. Defendant B did not discontinue to engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic, even though the act of arranging sexual traffic was discovered due to the reporting of M, etc. around September 2, 2015 and October 10, 2016, but did not discontinue to engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic again with some victims.

3. Defendant C

A. Summary of the assertion

With respect to the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Defendant C additionally lent KRW 30 million to Defendant B a security deposit, etc. of an accommodation necessary for arranging the instant sexual traffic, and Defendant C did not receive profits or directly participate in the act of arranging the sexual traffic, and even if he participated in the act of arranging the sexual traffic, it cannot be said that Defendant C was "business."

B. Determination

1) Whether Defendant C was involved in the act of arranging sexual traffic with Defendant A and Defendant B

A) Relevant legal principles

The co-principal under Article 30 of the Criminal Act is established by satisfying the subjective and objective requirements, such as the implementation of a crime through functional control based on the intent of co-processing and the intent of co-processing. Even in cases where part of the conspiracys have not been carried out by directly sharing part of the elements of a crime, if it is acknowledged that a functional control through an essential contribution to a crime exists rather than merely a mere conspiracy, but rather a functional control through an essential contribution to a crime, the so-called crime liability as a co-principal cannot be exempted (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Do235, Apr. 26, 2007).

B) Determination

In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, Defendant C and its defense counsel’s assertion is rejected, since Defendant C and their defense counsel are not accepted, in collusion with Defendant A and Defendant B, who received more than 150,000 won at one time at one time in return for sexual traffic from men in an unspecified gender purchase as described in paragraph (1) of the criminal facts in the judgment, and arranged sexual traffic to purchase sex of victims, N,0, P, etc. who are juveniles.

(1) From the end of July 2016, Defendant B made a statement to the effect that Defendant C had consistently made it difficult for the investigative agency to collect money through Defendant C, Defendant B, N,O, M and sexual traffic, and that the distribution of profits would have been divided into 6:4 (Evidence No. 272 to 274 of the record), Defendant C and Defendant B made a statement to the effect that: (a) all necessary funds were to be raised by Defendant C; (b) there was little gap with Defendant C when women have fled; and (c) Defendant C made a statement to the effect that it was difficult for the victims to have wrong management of women C; and (d) Defendant C had consistently made a statement to the effect that there was no more than 6% of the initial statements made by the police after Defendant C to have made a statement to Defendant C with Defendant C’s first statement to Defendant C without mentioning its credibility, in light of the following facts: (a) Defendant A made a statement to Defendant C’s first statement to Defendant C and its first statement to Defendant C, which did not bring about sexual traffic.

(2) The victim 0, V, and N of the instant act of arranging sexual traffic is consistent with the statement of the defendant Eul and the defendant Eul to the effect that the defendant Eul proposed sexual traffic as follows, and that the money was processed by the defendant C, and that he did not hear the horses, and that the defendant C took part in the instant act of arranging sexual traffic, and that he participated in the instant act of arranging sexual traffic.

① On October 17, 2016, at the first police station, the victim stated that 'C's female-friendly X was her mother-child her mother-child her husband and her husband, 'C' was her from the beginning of the police inquiry 'A' and 'C' was her one time a day, and 'C' was her mother-child her husband and her mother-child her mother-child her husband and her mother-child her husband. The victim stated that 'C' was her mother-child her to her mother and her mother-child her mother her to her mother-child her husband (Evidence No. 654 of the evidence record), 'C' began her wife at the police station on October 18, 2016 and she was her mother-child her to her mother-child her mother-child her mother-child her mother-child her mother-child her mother-child her mother-child her mother.

② On October 17, 2016, the victim V stated that "A" was made a reservation to customers, "A" was made by the police, "A" was made, "A" was made at the time when he was aware of the low scart's speech, "C was made arbitrary sexual traffic" (Evidence No. 633 of the evidence record), "C was made at the time when she became aware of, became aware of, came to the police, or was made at the time when she became aware of, sexual traffic, and when she became aware of, or was able to know, she was able to do so, and when she was able to do so, she was able to do so, and she was able to do so (Evidence No. 672 of the evidence record). In addition, the victim also proposed sexual traffic in this court, "A" was made by a female juvenile who does not escape or speak, and the victim made a statement to the effect that C and C were able to have been able to do so.

③ On October 21, 2016, at the first police station, the victim N stated that "C was fluort B fluort, and C was fluort, and that C was fluort with money to the author. C stated that it was "B fluort only once without being locked at a house," and that Defendant C was involved in sexual traffic, and stated that it was "n't in the police's inquiry whether he was involved in sexual traffic," and that it was "n't be involved in the reason for think," and that it was "if he was well aware of how he was fluort, but he was not related to C" (Evidence No. 238 of the record).

However, the victim N reversed the above statement on the day when it stated as above, and stated that it was difficult for Defendant C to take a retaliation (Evidence No. 245 of the evidence record), and that Defendant C took part in the act of arranging sexual traffic of this case consistently thereafter, and in this court, Defendant C started sexual traffic by proposing sexual traffic at first with Defendant B and Defendant C received money from Defendant B. Thus, the victim N's initial police statement is hard to believe in light of the reversal process and other victims' statements that Defendant C took part in the act of arranging sexual traffic of this case, and it is more reliable in a consistent statement thereafter.

(4) The above victims' statements cannot be deemed to have been made in favor of the victims without direct experience, and there is no reasonable ground for the victims to make false statements. In particular, in the case of the victims 0 and V, the investigative agency consistent with regard to Defendant C from the time to the court, and the fact that the victims took part in the act of arranging sexual traffic of this case. The above victims' statements are deemed to have high credibility as they are made by the defendants present at the police on October 17, 2016, prior to the arrest or voluntary action in Busan, prior to the investigation by the police.

(3) Defendant B and Defendant B made a statement to the effect that most of the earnings accrued from the instant commercial sex acts would result in Defendant C (Evidence No. 600, 601, 733, and 734). Also, Defendant C posted a statement to the effect that Defendant C would engage in a franchising of money owned by Defendant C or a franchising of money to her mother at the time of the instant commercial sex acts. Considering these circumstances, Defendant C had no special occupation at the time of the instant commercial sex acts, and Defendant B testified to the effect that Defendant C would pay money to Defendant C from this court. In full view of the fact that Defendant C had no special occupation at the time of the instant commercial sex acts and the victim N gave testimony to the effect that Defendant C would have paid money to Defendant C, the profits accrued from the instant commercial sex acts would result in a significant portion of Defendant C.

(4) Defendant C claimed to the effect that he lent a security deposit for Defendant B, who was released from the security deposit for the reasons for lending the security deposit, and that he continued to lend the security deposit to receive the money thereafter. However, Defendant C did not only prepare a security deposit for the lodging house left by the victims of sexual traffic, but also participated in the agreement by finding a real estate brokerage office directly in the case of the building underground 1 located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, without any special reason. In addition, Defendant C tried to grasp the location of the victims if the victims escape, and then, it appears that the victims want to receive education against the victims. Accordingly, it is difficult to accept the allegation by the Defendant C, considering the inevitable circumstances of the crime of sexual traffic in this case, considering that the provision of the place was inevitable, it is difficult to accept the aforementioned argument by the Defendant C.

2) Whether Defendant C engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic of this case

In full view of all the circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, Defendant C and his defense counsel are deemed to have engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic by dividing the roles under the intent to continue the act of arranging sexual traffic of this case with Defendant A and Defendant B, and sharing them with the intent to repeat the act of arranging sexual traffic of this case. Accordingly, Defendant C and his defense counsel cannot be accepted.

Reasons for sentencing

1. The scope of punishment by law;

(a) Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and nine months to eight years; or

B. Defendant B: Imprisonment with prison labor of three years and six months to six years and six months;

C. Defendant C: Imprisonment for a period of three years and six months from June to June 19.

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

A. Defendant A: The Defendant is a juvenile, and thus, is not subject to the sentencing guidelines.

B. Defendant B

1. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Good Offices, etc.)

[Determination of Types] The basic area of Type 3 (Provision of Place for Acts of buying sex for business or provision of brokerage information in information and communications network, etc.) for children and juveniles, such as arranging sexual traffic, etc.

【Special Convicted Person】

[Scope of Recommendation] April 6 to 8 years

2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault)

[Determination of Punishment] The basic area of Category 1 (General Violence)

【Special Convicted Person】

[Scope of Recommendation] February to October

3) Criteria for handling multiple crimes: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of four years to eight years;

C. Defendant C.

1. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Good Offices, etc.)

[Determination of Types] The basic area of Type 3 (Provision of Place for Acts of buying sex for business or provision of brokerage information in information and communications network, etc.) for children and juveniles, such as arranging sexual traffic, etc.

【Special Convicted Person】

[Scope of Recommendation] April 6 to 8 years

2) Crimes of assault

[Determination of Punishment] The basic area of No. 1 (General Violence)

【Special Convicted Person】

[Scope of Recommendation] February to October

(iii) Intimidation;

[Determination of Punishment] Basic Area of Punishment 1 (General Intimidation)

【Special Convicted Person】

[Scope of Recommendation] Two months to one year

4) Crimes of assaulting and abetting

[Determination of Punishment] The basic area of No. 1 (General Violence)

【Special Convicted Person】

[Scope of Recommendation] February to October

5) Standards for handling multiple crimes: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of four years to six months from August 10 to September 10;

3. Determination of sentence;

A. The Defendants’ act of arranging sexual traffic of this case does not establish a proper cadastral, mental, and sexual values, and the act of arranging the juveniles, who have yet to be well-founded in terms of physical development and social adaptation, to become the counterpart of sexual purchase, which seriously affects the creation of the proper sexual identity and values of the juveniles.

In addition, the defendants arranged commercial sex acts in an organized manner through smartphone display using juveniles who are not protected by their parents due to their running away from home, and all their payments for commercial sex acts are attributed to their own interests. Due to the defendants' act of arranging commercial sex acts, juveniles have continued to engage in commercial sex acts, thereby creating continuous demand for commercial sex acts by the juveniles, which eventually led to the rapid exploitation of commercial sex acts by the juveniles, and the possibility of their illegality and criticism is very high in that they play an important role in spreading commercial sex acts and spreading commercial sex acts.

B. Reasons for starting sentencing by Defendant

1) Defendant A

In addition, considering the circumstances favorable to the above defendant's age and intelligence, family relations, personality and behavior, living environment, health conditions, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., all of the sentencing factors in the trial process of this case, such as the defendant's age, and the defendant's age, has no record of criminal punishment as the defendant's age, and the defendant's family has no record of being subject to criminal punishment as the defendant's age, and the defendant's family is being able to take the lead of the defendant's wife, etc.

2) Defendant B

Except that the defendant is not engaged in the crime of this case as a business, the fact of the crime of this case is recognized as a substitute for the crime, and the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment and seems to have no economic benefits from the sexual traffic of this case, etc. are considered as favorable to the above defendant, and the defendant's age and intelligence, family relations, character and conduct, living environment, health conditions, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc. shall be determined as ordered by the sentencing guidelines beyond the lower limit of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines, considering all sentencing factors in the

3) Defendant C.

The Defendant does not seriously reflect the Defendant’s committing each of the instant crimes, including the instant act of arranging sexual traffic, by denying all of the instant crimes from investigative agencies to this court, and consistent with the vindications, etc., and the fact that most of the proceeds from the instant sexual traffic appears to have been acquired is the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant.

However, considering the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment, the parents of the defendant's parents are responsible for leading the defendant, and appeal for the wife, etc. in favor of the above defendant, the defendant's age and intelligence, family relations, character and conduct, living environment, health conditions, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the punishment as shown in the sentencing guidelines shall be determined by exceeding the lower limit of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines, considering all sentencing factors of the defendant in the trial process of this case, including

Registration of Personal Information

Where a conviction becomes final and conclusive for a crime of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, the Defendants are subject to the registration of personal information under Article 42 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and they are obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

The presiding judge shall be changed.

Judges Tae-young

Judicial Chief Judge;

1) The victims stated that they engaged in sexual traffic at least three days a day (Evidence Nos. 28, 235, 253, 695).