The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months and the return of victims) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime, and the Defendant had no record of punishment for larceny or fraud, such as the instant crime, before, and the damage caused by the instant crime appears not to be significant. Of the damaged items, a considerable number of the damaged items were returned to the victim on the date of arrest or by the decision of the court below, or expected to be returned to the victim by the decision of the court below, are favorable to the Defendant.

However, the thief crime of this case is a repeated crime committed several times against many victims; the defendant did not agree with the victims of the crime of this case; although there was no same criminal record, there was a history of criminal punishment for the previous crimes including suspended sentence of imprisonment, and there was no fixed residence, etc.; the defendant seems to have weak social ties, such as there was no other social ties; the court below appears to reflect all the favorable circumstances; there was no change in circumstances that would have different punishment in the trial; and there is no other change in circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relation, etc., the sentence of the court below is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.