A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

The application for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

In 201, the Defendant repeated detention and release due to the Lonopon medication case, and transferred the G hotel casino located in FF to H of the Future Savings Bank at the time when the Defendant was the representative director, and was released on April 4, 2005 and found investors for casino acceptance. On July 201, 2010, the Defendant was introduced to J of the victim D through I, and the victim was aware that he had a large amount of cash, and was able to borrow the casino acquisition fund from the victim.

1. On September 2010, the Defendant is required to post a telephone to the victim, and “G hotel casino receipt funds in the Seopo City F are needed.”

I sent a promissory note and a check of the parties to this part, and borrowed money as security. Upon acceptance of a casino, I stated that the casino will be repaid immediately.

However, in fact, the Defendant relied on the other party on most of the acceptance funds in order to require the funds of KRW 00 million, and it was unclear whether to accept the casino because it was impossible to attract investors for several years, so even if he borrowed money from the damaged party, he did not have the intention or ability to accept the casino and pay the money to the injured party.

The Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim, obtained a total of KRW 100 million from September 201 to September 2010 through I during several times from September 1, 2010 from the first patrol officer to the second patrol officer, and obtained a delivery of the sum of KRW 100 million.

2. On August 201, the Defendant, at the L hotel coffee shop located in K at around the middle of August 2011, has interrupted the acceptance of the victim’s “if there is a person who has agreed to participate in the takeover of the G hotel casino,” which would be the same.

It is difficult to fully pay all the money that he/she has borrowed to the person due to the lack of interference with the acceptance of the person.

The phrase “a loan of KRW 50 million” was changed.

However, the defendant's above is not clear whether to accept the casino, and the defendant borrows money from the injured party.