The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (three months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although it is recognized that the defendant led to confession and reflect by the judgment, the victims' degree of harm is relatively minor, contingent crimes are likely to be committed, and that the defendant should additionally be sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months for which the execution was suspended due to the decision to revoke the suspension of execution, etc., the defendant committed each of the instant violent crimes on two occasions without being aware of even though the defendant was in the crime of violence, and in particular, the crime of injury in this case was committed in prison, taking into account the following factors: the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence, and various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family relationship, motive, means and consequence after the crime, the above argument by

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.