logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2014.05.27 2014고단396
간통
Text

All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

Summary of Facts charged

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with the victim C around January 2004. A. The Defendant is a spouse.

On August 7, 2011, the Defendant, at the house of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, 116 Dong 601 B, had a sexual intercourse with B one time.

B. On October 1, 201, the Defendant sent the name at night to the Maurel with B twice, where the name at night cannot be known.

C. On October 28, 2011, the Defendant d apartment 116, 601, from the home of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, 116, 601, and d with B one another.

On January 7, 2012, the Defendant, at a low time, set up a B vehicle in the vicinity of the road near the Ulsan-Yansansan mountain, sent B and once sexual intercourses in B and one-time sexual intercourses in the accommodation where the name near the beach of Gangwon-do cannot be known at the night of the same day.

E. On October 15, 2012, the Defendant, at the house of Changwon-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, 116, 601, Daowon-si, Daowon-si, had a sexual intercourse with B once.

F. On November 3, 2012, the Defendant sent her panty defense room at a room where it is impossible to know about the Epanty defense room in the south of Korea at a low time. On the following day, the Defendant sent her panty room at B and once her panty zone.

G. On February 16, 2013, the Defendant, at the house of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, 116 Dong 601 B, sent to the Defendant with sexual intercourses B once with B.

H. On March 21, 2013, the Defendant, at the house of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Masan-si, 116 Dong 601 B, sent to the Defendant with sexual intercourse one time with B.

2. Defendant B knew that he is a spouse of A, the date and place specified in paragraph 1, and the foregoing 11-time sexual intercourse with A, respectively.

Judgment

Each of the facts charged in the instant case is a crime falling under Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the spouse files a complaint under Article 241(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records, the complainant C filed a complaint against Defendant B on May 19, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case.

arrow