logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.05.01 2018나307684
보증채무금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that from September 4, 2009 to October 19, 2009, the Plaintiff lent KRW 213 million to C, the Defendant’s actual operator.

On February 15, 2016, the Defendant drafted a written agreement (Evidence A No. 2; hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the intent to guarantee the obligation of the above loan to the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the money stated in the purport of the claim to the plaintiff as a guarantor with respect to C's above loan obligations.

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion is not acceptable on the sole basis of the written evidence No. 2 and the judgment, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow