1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. On November 4, 2009, the Plaintiff lent KRW 30,000,00 to C by the due date specified as of December 31, 2009, and the Defendant guaranteed C’s obligations to the Plaintiff at the time as the Silter’s land as of December 31, 2009.

B. In a lawsuit seeking the payment of the above loan to the Plaintiff as the Defendant (the Daejeon District Court Decision 2014Kadan6806 decided in favor of the Plaintiff) and the said judgment became final and conclusive, but C does not repay the above loan debt even upon the Plaintiff’s repeated demand for repayment of the loan. As such, the Defendant, the guarantor of the above loan debt, is liable to pay the Plaintiff the above money.

2. The Plaintiff submitted the evidence No. 1 (Evidence) as evidence supporting the above claim.

However, evidence No. 1 (Evidence) cannot be used as evidence because there is no evidence to prove the authenticity of the evidence, and there is no other evidence to prove the plaintiff's above assertion.

(O) According to the witness C’s testimony, the above loan certificate seems to have been prepared and sealed by C without legitimate authorization. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.