A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 1, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for obstructing the performance of official duties in the Seoul Central District Court for ten months, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for obstructing the performance of duties in the Seoul Northern District Court on December 27, 2011, and completed the execution of the said sentence on March 21, 2013, upon the final judgment became final and conclusive, on June 15, 2012.

1. On July 19, 2015, at the front of the “D” restaurant located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on July 19, 2015, the Defendant pointed out that the victim E (the 43 years old), who is a taxi engineer, and the cab customer, were wrong to the victim, and that “the victim’s “the victim’s “the victim’s “the victim’s speech” was spaced with the horses, the victim’s spawn spath, and the victim’s spawn spath, and the victim’s spawn spath with the victim’s spath, so that it is difficult to identify the number of days of treatment.

2. While the Defendant was in dispute with the above E for the said reasons at the same time and place as set forth in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the investigation of a criminal investigation by assaulting the police officer’s face on one occasion, by checking the situation from E and the Defendant, and by arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of bodily injury, by checking the situation from E and the Defendant, and refusing to arrest the Defendant as a police officer of the Mapo Police Station of Seoul Mapo Police Station, which was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report of 112 from the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

The facts set forth in the judgment No. 1 of the judgment, other than the facts before the judgment, are not true.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The facts set forth in the judgment No. 2 in full view of the victim E's wife photographs, etc.

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Recording of the witness G's statement in the second public trial records;

1. Entry of the statement in E and G in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the accused in the prosecution;

1. The respective police statements, etc. in relation to E and G may be recognized respectively by taking into account the police statements, etc.