logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.08.29 2014고합231
준강간치상
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2014, at around 04:00, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol at the Defendant’s house located in Gwangju-gu D apartment 204 dong 803, Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, the Defendant took advantage of the Defendant’s situation where the Defendant was unable to resist 30 years of age, making quasi-rape-rape by having the victim engage in sexual intercourse once by taking advantage of the victim’s situation where he was unable to resist her home (the age of 30) and, at the same time, obstructed the victim’s knife and ma as "ma" and prevented the victim from committing the Defendant’s behavior, thereby suppressing the victim’s resistance against the victim’s resistance, thereby causing approximately two weeks of treatment:

Summary of Evidence

Criminal facts in holding

1. Any statement made by the defendant in compliance with this Act;

1. Statement prepared by the assistant judicial police officer of E (victim) in compliance with such statement;

1. A statement that conforms to the part and degree of the injury described in the judgment, among the diagnosis certificates for E (victims) prepared by a doctor F;

1. Since the investigation report prepared by the assistant chief of the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office (a statement of injury to a victim and attachment of medical records) can be recognized, there is proof.

Defendant

and the determination of this court by defense counsel

1. The injury inflicted on the victim due to the instant crime alleged by the Defendant and his defense counsel is insignificant and naturally cured, and thus, the crime of injury resulting from quasi-rape does not constitute “injury”.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, during the Defendant’s quasi-rape crime, the court tried to restrain the Defendant’s behavior by breaking the Defendant’s body with a shouldered, shacking the Defendant. The Defendant, in order to suppress the victim’s resistance, committed an act, such as preventing the victim from suffering by hand, taking the victim’s head, etc., and the victim was under medical treatment by undergoing the diagnosis of “the following, etc. and the head of the victim’s head” at the hospital.

arrow