A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 8, 2015, around 20:21, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties, at the starting point of the 112 Kimpo Airport located in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, 112 Kimpo Airport, in a situation where the departure time is imminent, he/she went to the boarding bridge 15 hours during the influence of alcohol in order to board the ebbbbbban Busan flight engine, and he/she was found to be above the string distance. When he/she refused to board by the Ebroban employee B of Ebansan who found such form, he/she was sitting down on the floor and waiting to sit up on the floor, and he/she is waiting to sit up on the floor so far as he/she goes up on. B. B. It is called to send it to Busan. B. It is called to the sending of it to Busan, and despite repeated comments made by the airline employees, etc.,

Cheongju Asian or aircraft scheduled to arrive at 21:30 thereafter, was in a situation where passengers in Gwangju Asian or aircraft should use the passage of the boarding bridge No. 15, and the airline employees, etc. requested to secure the passage again, and continued verbal abuse “I do not keep only once her Mad. B when she drawn up Mad. B,” and continued to do so.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with aviation operation of the Korea Airports Corporation and airlines by force.

2. The Defendant committed an assault, such as: (a) during the course of arresting a flagrant offender by the police force of the Kimpo Airport, who was arrested at the above time and at the above time and place, and forced him to enter the boarding bridge in the direction of the exit; and (b) during the course of moving the bridge of the police force of the Kimpo Airport in the direction of the exit exit; (c) having the Defendant kneee-knee-knee-knee-knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties by assault.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each written statement and written statements to statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act for criminal facts (a point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act for the obstruction of performance of official duties.