A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On February 14, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution for the crime of interference with business at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 7, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant violating the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. is a person recommended to invest in officetels by the victim E, who is an authorized intermediary of the “D” in the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan

On November 5, 2017, the Defendant sent letters to the victim in the same manner 324 times from November 4, 2017 to April 21, 2018, as indicated in the annexed Table 1, including sending letters, such as “inward liquor tax, in the amount of money with 20 minutes of internal work,” and “in the amount of money with 20 minutes of inland work,” and “in the amount of money with 20 minutes of inland work,” and “in the same manner, from November 6, 2017 to September 21, 2018, the Defendant sent letters to the victim in the same manner as indicated in the annexed Table 1.” On November 9, 2017, the Defendant sent the victim the phone to the victim at an irregular place, and called “All E responsibilities are expected to arrive within 20 minutes of the office D. office,” and written in the same way as the phone at the same time during the same time as the phone 26 minutes from November 6, 2017 to September 26.

As a result, the Defendant reached repeatedly the text and sound that arouses fears or apprehensions for the victim.

2. On September 6, 2018, from around 16:00 to 17:30, the Defendant alleged that he had been involved in the sales of officetels E by the said real estate employee E, which was operated by the victim F, and that he had been involved in the sales of officetels, and that there was a victim, other employees, and customers, the Defendant had an article with the victim, and had the victim, “the year that would have caused the occurrence of the incident, the alteration of the morale, and the entry into the document,” and “the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs,” and “the police or the prosecutor,

The alteration of this fraud is to arrest the party.

N It is not a way to force N to understand the same softs.

Gah H. H. H.D.