logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.10.30 2014고합208
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Where a person works on an election campaign by transmitting text messages at a time other than the election day, persons who may send such messages by means of automatic broadcast communications utilizing computer networks shall be limited to candidates and preliminary candidates.

1. On May 29, 2014, Defendant A connected to “G” the pay transmission service of text messages using a computer installed therein at the F container office located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, North Korea on May 13:30, 2014;

6.4. The local election and 6,774 electors related to the electorates have the opportunity to make a good H I better H, such as Japan, H Day, etc. The verified HH candidate No. 4 affixed I mp. I mpeded. A sent text messages that appeal for support to I. A m. with the content of the “I mar”.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant is not a candidate or preliminary candidate, the Defendant carried out an election campaign by sending text messages by means of automatic broadcast communications.

2. On June 3, 2014, at the above F container office around 14:42 on June 3, 2014, Defendant B visited “G” with an Internet text message transmission service using a computer installed therein;

6. 4. The local election and 3,156 electors related to the electorates will not be subject to seeing and affixing them. I candidates will be able to be respected. He will begin with H which is good to see. No. 4 I candidates. He will be able to see. He will send text messages to the 3,156 electorates. He sent a text message to appeal for support to I of the content of JI.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant is not a candidate or preliminary candidate, the Defendant carried out an election campaign by sending text messages by means of automatic broadcast communications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Details of letters dispatched and letters sent by suspects B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of photograph of character sent by suspect B;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow