logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 09. 07. 선고 2017두47120 판결
쟁점부동산을 모가 원고에게 명의신탁한 이유로 부과처분이 부당한지의 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-34195 (Law No. 23, 2017)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho Jae-2015-2855 (Law No. 17, 2015)

Title

Whether the disposition of imposition is unreasonable on the ground that the mother of the key real estate title trust to the Plaintiff

Summary

Under the substance over form principle, the person liable to pay the relevant capital gains tax has the burden of proving that the title truster who is the subject of the transfer does not become the taxpayer, but can be subject to the substance over form under the substance over form principle.

Related statutes

Article 14 of the Framework Act on National Taxes

Cases

2017Du47120 Revocation of a tax imposition disposition

Plaintiff

AA

Defendant

AA Head of the Tax Office

Imposition of Judgment

on October 2017 07

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

arrow