beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for any of the crimes of subparagraphs 1, 2, and 3 in its holding, and for any of the crimes of Articles 4, 5, and 6 in its holding.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On March 16, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court and two years of suspended execution, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on March 24, 2017.
[2] In order to raise money to use for living expenses, entertainment expenses, etc. due to the absence of a certain amount of income, Defendant A / [Defendant A] opened a new mobile phone by making a false statement to the victim G (at the age of 27 years) who became aware of through the Internet SNS North Korea, and received the mobile phone and received the mobile phone and sold it to the medium and medium-sized mobile phone company or received the money.
1. The Defendant, on November 14, 2016, at a place where it is difficult to know the location 2-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government large-scale 2-dong, Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Mebling off Me
On November 15, 2016, the victim opened a cell phone sales store located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Daedong with 1,000,000 won or more of the market price of the 128GB as KT communications station. On November 16, 2016, the victim opened a 71 cell phone sales store located in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seo-gu, by getting the victim open a 71 mobile phone sales store with 1,000,000 won or more of the market price of the 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won or more from the offline sales store, and received the opening of a 71 mobile phone sales store at the SG U communications company from around that time.
However, as the defendant mentioned in H does not exist, there was no intention and ability to make the victim receive five million won per month, and accordingly, even if the victim gets a mobile phone from the victim, he did not return the mobile phone again to the victim, and he did not use the money received by selling it from the used mobile phone company for personal purposes.
As such, the Defendant.