logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.01.07 2014고단4248
사문서변조등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by four months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant issued a certificate of balance and balance of his happiness funeral hall and received a certificate of balance and balance as stated “Won 600” and the date of issuance “Fon May 22, 2014” from the National Bank Mining Center in the 1582-3, Masan-dong, Masan-dong, Gwangju-dong, issued a certificate of deposit and trust of his happiness funeral hall to use it for construction contract with D and D Co., Ltd. by altering it.

1. On May 25, 2014, the Defendant changed a private document by inserting the “Won 1,600,000,600” using a word “Won 23, using a word “Don 1,600,000,000” in a copy store near the Yong-dong, Jeonnam-gu, Gwangju, and then printing it out, and then printing it, “Won 1,600,000,600” in the “Won 600” in the “Won 1,60,000,000,” and “22” in the “date of issuance” in the “22” in the “date of issuance” respectively. The Defendant changed one copy of the balance and certificate in the name of the head of the branch office of the Korea Mine Bank, a private document related to a certificate of fact.

2. Around May 2014, the Defendant issued the modified balance and balance certificate as if they were duly formed, while talking about the vice president F and the construction contract at the office of a stock company D located in the Seo-gu in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the statement statement made by the police officer G;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Alteration of private documents as indicated in the judgment: Article 231 of the Criminal Act;

(b) The use of the altered private document as indicated in the judgment: Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The range of recommendations on the sentencing criteria [decision of types] shall be the type 1 (Counterfeit, Alteration, etc. of Private Documents) (special scams).

arrow