1. All appeals filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) regarding the instant principal lawsuit and the counterclaim are dismissed.

2...

1. The grounds for appeal by Defendant B Cultural Institute citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment by the court of first instance are justified even if evidence submitted in the court of first instance is examined.

Therefore, the reasoning of this court's judgment is identical to that of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal under Paragraph 2 below, and therefore, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The highest part of the judgment of the first instance is as follows: “(1) Of the instant forest land, J forest is either wholly or almost entirely transferred.”

(1) The forest of this case is deleted from the point of view that the Plaintiffs, the owners of the forest of this case, and the Defendants, who were incorporated into the Y site implemented by the Korea Highway Corporation, were allocated a statement of scheduled incorporation and a statement of guide for compensation for losses (Evidence A9). The forest of this case appears to be either included in the case of K forest of this case or to be included in the case of K forest of this case.

Part 11 of the judgment of the first instance is "(4)", Part 15 (6) of the same side is "(5)", "Act 18 (7) of the same side is "(6)", "Act 20 (8) of the same side is "(7)", and "Act 12 (9) of the first instance judgment is "(8)", respectively.

3. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals filed by Defendant B Cultural Institute against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim of this case are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.